Tuesday, 31 August 2010
Tuesday, 17 August 2010
Increasing A Car's MPG....
There's great documentary that's called something like "Who killed The Electric Car" and describes how in the 70's or 80's California had a number of electric cars that ran on batteries. Apparently they were very efficient as well as popular, but the powers that be made sure that these perfectly good cars were rounded up and crushed. The "powers that be" included the oil industry, car industry...(these ultimately being the puppets of the banks) and of course the government (REAL puppets of the bankers).....Amongst other things this documentary described how an oil company had bought up the patents for the electric car's improved battery capacity. So there seems to me at least, forces involved in making motoring more expensive than need be.
Speaking to my fellow enthusiast Tom Hackett about this sort of thing, Tom told me an interesting story. Just after World War 2, his dad worked at Austin looking after engine, gear box problems etc that other engineers couldn't sort out. One of of the projects he was involved with was a means of injecting water vapour through the fuel system. The idea was that after the engine had warmed up the petrol/air mix was unnecessarily rich so a DILUTED PETROL/AIR mix might work just as efficiently. So along with petrol vapour and air there would be an injection of water vapour. Tom said that his dad said there was a doubling of the fuel efficiency for this system...but why haven't we heard any more ? Well, why do I find that surprising ! (Incidentally, many people report that their vehicle runs better in the ran - because of the increase of water vapour through the carburettor ? )
After discussing this Tom subsequently sent me a link for this:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/ethanol_motherearth/me3.html which deals with the same idea.
I have just started experimenting putting acetone in my car after find this article on the net :
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-BetterLiving/+Doc-BetterLiving-General&Msc/AcetoneInFuelIncreasesMileage.htm
..it's supposed to increase the vapourisation of petrol and so make it more efficient.
Speaking to my fellow enthusiast Tom Hackett about this sort of thing, Tom told me an interesting story. Just after World War 2, his dad worked at Austin looking after engine, gear box problems etc that other engineers couldn't sort out. One of of the projects he was involved with was a means of injecting water vapour through the fuel system. The idea was that after the engine had warmed up the petrol/air mix was unnecessarily rich so a DILUTED PETROL/AIR mix might work just as efficiently. So along with petrol vapour and air there would be an injection of water vapour. Tom said that his dad said there was a doubling of the fuel efficiency for this system...but why haven't we heard any more ? Well, why do I find that surprising ! (Incidentally, many people report that their vehicle runs better in the ran - because of the increase of water vapour through the carburettor ? )
After discussing this Tom subsequently sent me a link for this:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library/ethanol_motherearth/me3.html which deals with the same idea.
I have just started experimenting putting acetone in my car after find this article on the net :
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-BetterLiving/+Doc-BetterLiving-General&Msc/AcetoneInFuelIncreasesMileage.htm
..it's supposed to increase the vapourisation of petrol and so make it more efficient.
Wednesday, 11 August 2010
A Tale Of Two Batteries - Bedini Fan Motor Results
(See earlier blogs on fan motor kit) . So, to begin with we used the "grey" battery as the primary and the "black" battery as the one being charged. According to the manufacturer's labels the grey is 12v and 66 Amp hour and the black 12v and 45 Ah. The grey battery is the one we have worked on longer,"conditioned" being the one most originally "decrepit".The black battery was taken out of my old car before it was scrapped and was still a good battery. The difference in amp hour rating in the batteries is regrettable in terms of keeping things constant and just varying one thing at a time, but we live in the real world and don't have inexhaustible funds to buy identical batteries - perhaps later on :-)
So with the usual set up we took the following readings with the analogue multimeter. The accuracy allowed me to take voltage readings to the nearest 1/4 of a volt.
I tried to take readings every hour or so.
Primary Charging
29/7/10 14:12 Grey=5.5 V , Black 11.25 V
15:18 5.5 11.25
18.59 5.5 11.5
22.20 6.0 11.5
23.40 6.0 11.5
30/7/10 03:28 6.0 11.5
08:52 3.5 11.25
09:39 3.5 11.25
10:52 3.5 11.25
12:14 3.5 11.25
14:21 3.25 11.25
16.58 3.25 11.25
19:13 3.5 11.25
21:01 3.25 11.5
21:58 3.5 11.5
23:04 3.5 11.5
31/07/10 02:01 3.5 11.5
08:15 3.0 11.5
11:00 3.25 11.25
12:13 3.25 11.25
15:55 1.5 11.25
17:47 1.5 11.25
18:59 2.0 11.5
19:47 2.0 11.5
20:37 2.0 11.5
21:46 2.0 11.5
1/08/10 00:04 1.5 11.25
01:16 2.0 11.5
08:44 1.5 11.25
10:25 1.5 11.25
11:03 1.5 11.25
13:03 1.5 11.25
13:31 1.5 11.25
15:05 1.5 11.25
15:34 1.5 11.25
17:40 1.5 11.25
19:02 1.5 11.5
20:25 1.75 11.25
22:30 1.75 11.5
23:28 1.5 11.5
2/08/10 07:55 1.5 11.0
08:50 1.5 11.25
11:20 1.25 11.25
12:13 1.25 11.25
13:19 1.25 11.25
14:32 1.5 11.25
15:56 1.5 11.25
17:10 1.25 11.25
18:26 1.25 11.25
19:15 1.25 11.25
20:53 1.5 11.5
21:33 1.5 11.5
22:58 1.5 11.5
3/08/10 00:15 1.5 11.5
02:08 1.5 11.25
09:10 1.25 11.25
10:21 1.25 11.25
12:47 1.25 11.25
15:16 1.25 11.25
16:20 FAN STOPPED as I was resting elbows on table to take voltage reading. It was moving very slowly at this stage. So, the fan motor worked for over five days before the primary battery became "flat" (whatever that may mean :-) )
The batteries were now swapped over
Primary Charging
3/08/10 16:37 Black = 11.0 V , Grey= 2.0 V
16:55 11.0 2.0
17:35 8.75 3.25
18:56 9 4
21:49 9 3.75
23:24 8.75 4
4/08/10 00:48 6.25 4
09:07 3 3.5
12:36 3 3.5
15:15 2 3.5
19:30 STOPPED BY THIS TIME
STARTED AGAIN WITH BATTERIES IN SAME POSITION but soon stopped.
SO, the lower amp hour battery only powered the fan for over a day.
Conclusion.
I was disappointed initially with the seemingly poor performance of the fan motor after swapping to the lower amp hour battery as the primary source. I was expecting a longer running time, EVEN ALLOWING FOR THE LOWER Ah , a proportionate running time might have been something like 45/66 x 5 days....very roughly three and "a bit " days instead of one day and "a bit" that we got.
Tom Hackett reminded me that it was the conditioned battery that had run the longest, and more to the point, proportionately longest( according to the Ah).
Tom, using his own Bedini motor has been working on two clapped out batteries of his own. More on this on a later blog, but after some discussion with him we once again had the sense of what all the different measurements (current,voltage, power,energy, work etc) mean in the real world. Tom said a small lamp attached to the batteries was somehow giving him a greater sense of the battery's "potential" for work than the voltage reading took. Tom's feeling is that something is "definitely going on " with the Bedini charged batteries. On the face of it the greater conditioned battery above worked harder than the less conditioned black battery. Drawing on Tom's observations here and elsewhere on the blog, we are seeing something in terms of battery conditioning, but what this means in terms of assessing "overunity", remains to be seen. For now we continue with the experimenting.
So with the usual set up we took the following readings with the analogue multimeter. The accuracy allowed me to take voltage readings to the nearest 1/4 of a volt.
I tried to take readings every hour or so.
Primary Charging
29/7/10 14:12 Grey=5.5 V , Black 11.25 V
15:18 5.5 11.25
18.59 5.5 11.5
22.20 6.0 11.5
23.40 6.0 11.5
30/7/10 03:28 6.0 11.5
08:52 3.5 11.25
09:39 3.5 11.25
10:52 3.5 11.25
12:14 3.5 11.25
14:21 3.25 11.25
16.58 3.25 11.25
19:13 3.5 11.25
21:01 3.25 11.5
21:58 3.5 11.5
23:04 3.5 11.5
31/07/10 02:01 3.5 11.5
08:15 3.0 11.5
11:00 3.25 11.25
12:13 3.25 11.25
15:55 1.5 11.25
17:47 1.5 11.25
18:59 2.0 11.5
19:47 2.0 11.5
20:37 2.0 11.5
21:46 2.0 11.5
1/08/10 00:04 1.5 11.25
01:16 2.0 11.5
08:44 1.5 11.25
10:25 1.5 11.25
11:03 1.5 11.25
13:03 1.5 11.25
13:31 1.5 11.25
15:05 1.5 11.25
15:34 1.5 11.25
17:40 1.5 11.25
19:02 1.5 11.5
20:25 1.75 11.25
22:30 1.75 11.5
23:28 1.5 11.5
2/08/10 07:55 1.5 11.0
08:50 1.5 11.25
11:20 1.25 11.25
12:13 1.25 11.25
13:19 1.25 11.25
14:32 1.5 11.25
15:56 1.5 11.25
17:10 1.25 11.25
18:26 1.25 11.25
19:15 1.25 11.25
20:53 1.5 11.5
21:33 1.5 11.5
22:58 1.5 11.5
3/08/10 00:15 1.5 11.5
02:08 1.5 11.25
09:10 1.25 11.25
10:21 1.25 11.25
12:47 1.25 11.25
15:16 1.25 11.25
16:20 FAN STOPPED as I was resting elbows on table to take voltage reading. It was moving very slowly at this stage. So, the fan motor worked for over five days before the primary battery became "flat" (whatever that may mean :-) )
The batteries were now swapped over
Primary Charging
3/08/10 16:37 Black = 11.0 V , Grey= 2.0 V
16:55 11.0 2.0
17:35 8.75 3.25
18:56 9 4
21:49 9 3.75
23:24 8.75 4
4/08/10 00:48 6.25 4
09:07 3 3.5
12:36 3 3.5
15:15 2 3.5
19:30 STOPPED BY THIS TIME
STARTED AGAIN WITH BATTERIES IN SAME POSITION but soon stopped.
SO, the lower amp hour battery only powered the fan for over a day.
Conclusion.
I was disappointed initially with the seemingly poor performance of the fan motor after swapping to the lower amp hour battery as the primary source. I was expecting a longer running time, EVEN ALLOWING FOR THE LOWER Ah , a proportionate running time might have been something like 45/66 x 5 days....very roughly three and "a bit " days instead of one day and "a bit" that we got.
Tom Hackett reminded me that it was the conditioned battery that had run the longest, and more to the point, proportionately longest( according to the Ah).
Tom, using his own Bedini motor has been working on two clapped out batteries of his own. More on this on a later blog, but after some discussion with him we once again had the sense of what all the different measurements (current,voltage, power,energy, work etc) mean in the real world. Tom said a small lamp attached to the batteries was somehow giving him a greater sense of the battery's "potential" for work than the voltage reading took. Tom's feeling is that something is "definitely going on " with the Bedini charged batteries. On the face of it the greater conditioned battery above worked harder than the less conditioned black battery. Drawing on Tom's observations here and elsewhere on the blog, we are seeing something in terms of battery conditioning, but what this means in terms of assessing "overunity", remains to be seen. For now we continue with the experimenting.
Wednesday, 4 August 2010
September 11 Attacks
Like most people who start blogging, I did so with a view to one subject. It's difficult to stick to your original remit when something of a truthful nature comes your way that MUST be spread as wide as possible. (Along with the below video, get yourself a copy of the "September Clues" video. )
A eureka moment : "The plane was attached to the pod - not the pod to the plane !"
All intelligent people when presented with the evidence of the September 11th attacks MUST acknowledge it was an inside job. Unfortunately MOST people are a combination of not being : 1) Intelligent enough or 2) Not caring enough and perhaps at some sub conscious level accepting the "sacrifice" of all the lives on that day to "justify" the subsequent militarism and economic consequences that impact on their own lives or 3) Not sufficiently informed....which this video may go some way correct.
A eureka moment : "The plane was attached to the pod - not the pod to the plane !"
All intelligent people when presented with the evidence of the September 11th attacks MUST acknowledge it was an inside job. Unfortunately MOST people are a combination of not being : 1) Intelligent enough or 2) Not caring enough and perhaps at some sub conscious level accepting the "sacrifice" of all the lives on that day to "justify" the subsequent militarism and economic consequences that impact on their own lives or 3) Not sufficiently informed....which this video may go some way correct.
Tuesday, 27 July 2010
More Banter About The Bedini SSG Circuit
Tom Hackett came up with something interesting regarding the Bedini SSG circuit. Instead of the output going to a charging battery, it's going to an automotive coil which is firing a spark plug via an HT lead. AROUND the HT lead Tom has placed an induction coil. Why is this ?
Well, John Bedini has said that basically that "nature doesn't like closed loop systems.....IN ORDER TO USE THE CHARGING BATTERY TO SOMEHOW 'CLOSELOOP' (for want of a better description) THE SYSTEM YOU HAVE TO USE AN INVERTOR. I must say this confused me. In fact I emailed Anthony Craddock, the producer of the "Energy From The Vacuum" series of videos to ask about this, and he didn't know what John Bedini meant. For a few weeks I was under the illusion that even if you physically swapped the batteries and the CHARGING BATTERY became the PRIMARY BATTERY then the now PRIMARY BATTERY had to be connected via an invertor to the Bedini circuit - I WAS WRONG...
So, Tom's idea of the induction coil is a prototype invertor idea....(Incidentally Tom mentioned that he did try and connected the primary and charging batteries directly and sparks flew ! :-) ) that we believe Bedini alluded to.
Part One
Part Two
The difficulty with all this work is measurement. This is discussed at length on Part 15, "Seeking Overunity - Rosenthal Memoirs" of the Energy From The Vacuum series. Rosenthal mentions you can't just use an oscilloscope and that's that with regard to seeking overunity. We see his extensive measurement facilities and apparatus. Factor into this ,John Bedini's assertion that the radiantly charged batteries can't be measured meaningfully by conventional means and we find ourselves again asking: How we can demonstrate to ourselves "overunity" ?
....With this in mind, work in the near future for Tom Hackett and myself Simon Smith will involve: 1/Tom working on the invertor theme and 2/ Myself QUALITATIVELY (with some attempt at QUANTITATIVE measurement :-) ) running the fan motor kit and somehow ( :- ) ) assessing the (improved :-) ) state of the 12V car batteries.
Well, John Bedini has said that basically that "nature doesn't like closed loop systems.....IN ORDER TO USE THE CHARGING BATTERY TO SOMEHOW 'CLOSELOOP' (for want of a better description) THE SYSTEM YOU HAVE TO USE AN INVERTOR. I must say this confused me. In fact I emailed Anthony Craddock, the producer of the "Energy From The Vacuum" series of videos to ask about this, and he didn't know what John Bedini meant. For a few weeks I was under the illusion that even if you physically swapped the batteries and the CHARGING BATTERY became the PRIMARY BATTERY then the now PRIMARY BATTERY had to be connected via an invertor to the Bedini circuit - I WAS WRONG...
So, Tom's idea of the induction coil is a prototype invertor idea....(Incidentally Tom mentioned that he did try and connected the primary and charging batteries directly and sparks flew ! :-) ) that we believe Bedini alluded to.
Part One
Part Two
The difficulty with all this work is measurement. This is discussed at length on Part 15, "Seeking Overunity - Rosenthal Memoirs" of the Energy From The Vacuum series. Rosenthal mentions you can't just use an oscilloscope and that's that with regard to seeking overunity. We see his extensive measurement facilities and apparatus. Factor into this ,John Bedini's assertion that the radiantly charged batteries can't be measured meaningfully by conventional means and we find ourselves again asking: How we can demonstrate to ourselves "overunity" ?
....With this in mind, work in the near future for Tom Hackett and myself Simon Smith will involve: 1/Tom working on the invertor theme and 2/ Myself QUALITATIVELY (with some attempt at QUANTITATIVE measurement :-) ) running the fan motor kit and somehow ( :- ) ) assessing the (improved :-) ) state of the 12V car batteries.
Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Assembly/Disassembly Of Bedini Fan Motor Kit
OK, this, as is the nature of blogs, is not in the chronological order that someone trying to build the Bedini fan motor kit might necessarily appreciate. The reader is referred to previous blogs
1/ Drawing of components on matrix board
2/ The fan motor working
The below three videos will be boring to anyone who hasn't bought the fan kit, but might be a Godsend to those struggling with this project. Like many things in life the things we think may cause us problems don't and unseen things do cause problems. I might well have called this blog entry "Fiddling Around With The F***ing Circlip !"
Tom Hackett explains wiring very clearly to me, someone with not much "Hands On" common sense.
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
The Bedini fan kit together with schematics can be purchased from the Bedini website. Link on the right. My intention over the next few months is to source the same components and some other fan bought locally with the same project in mind - with me (Simon Smith) as an "Hands On " novice trying to put the thing together . I might say that I was shocked at having to pay £28 import tax on the Bedini fan kit
1/ Drawing of components on matrix board
2/ The fan motor working
The below three videos will be boring to anyone who hasn't bought the fan kit, but might be a Godsend to those struggling with this project. Like many things in life the things we think may cause us problems don't and unseen things do cause problems. I might well have called this blog entry "Fiddling Around With The F***ing Circlip !"
Tom Hackett explains wiring very clearly to me, someone with not much "Hands On" common sense.
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
The Bedini fan kit together with schematics can be purchased from the Bedini website. Link on the right. My intention over the next few months is to source the same components and some other fan bought locally with the same project in mind - with me (Simon Smith) as an "Hands On " novice trying to put the thing together . I might say that I was shocked at having to pay £28 import tax on the Bedini fan kit
Friday, 16 July 2010
An Absolutely Brilliant Documentary About Money !
This blogsite's mission is to popularise and explore what Tom Bearden has described as "Energy From the Vacuum". If the only problem was the engineering then I believe that the world's energy challenges would have been solved a long time ago. It was the banker J P Morgan who castigated Nikola Tesla for tapping the earth's energy without having the means to "meter" it for consumer consumption. So, the story of this quest for accessing what nature freely give us has a component related to the politics and greed of a relatively few people.
What if there was an alternative to oil for energy ? How would that affect the currencies (especially the dollar) of the world ? The denominating of oil sales in dollars , the "petrodollar" is what keeps the value of the dollar high, and the reason for the umpteen American military bases around the world. Oil is the commodity that back the dollar, the same way gold used to.
The documentary I recommend to you is called the "Secret Of OZ" by William Still. Also known for his two part "Money Masters" documentaries. In it he shows how linking gold to a currency makes it liable to manipulation.(Perhaps the same could be said of oil ?). More importantly he describes how the governments of the west and elsewhere have been corrupted by their association with the debt based money system of the private bankers who live in the intestine of national government like parasitical worms. William Still's conclusion is that it's not what backs a currency that is important, but who controls the volume of currency !
Here are the the reviews at Amazon
Discussed also here
What if there was an alternative to oil for energy ? How would that affect the currencies (especially the dollar) of the world ? The denominating of oil sales in dollars , the "petrodollar" is what keeps the value of the dollar high, and the reason for the umpteen American military bases around the world. Oil is the commodity that back the dollar, the same way gold used to.
The documentary I recommend to you is called the "Secret Of OZ" by William Still. Also known for his two part "Money Masters" documentaries. In it he shows how linking gold to a currency makes it liable to manipulation.(Perhaps the same could be said of oil ?). More importantly he describes how the governments of the west and elsewhere have been corrupted by their association with the debt based money system of the private bankers who live in the intestine of national government like parasitical worms. William Still's conclusion is that it's not what backs a currency that is important, but who controls the volume of currency !
Here are the the reviews at Amazon
Discussed also here
Monday, 12 July 2010
Bedini Simplified School Girl Motor Discussion
Those who come to this page not having heard of John Bedini and "Radiant Energy" should first check out the Bedini website linked on the right. They should check out Tom Bearden's website also linked on the right. You should also consider getting at least the first DVD in the "Energy From The Vacuum Series" which will almost certainly explain the concepts better than us !
So what's the point of this blog then , with the clumsily shot video and awkward attempts at explanations of cutting edge technology ? The point is that it shows pretty ordinary but very interested people trying to bring this stuff down from the "top of the mountain". "If these fellas can do it", might be the sentiment, "so can we !". We are following in the footsteps of others and hopefully the path will in time become easier to travel along. We are just doing "our bit".
Tom Hackett and myself are discussing the so called Bedini "Simplified School Girl motor" that Tom built. John Bedini came up with the name in order, we suppose to make this technology more simple..."if a schoolgirl can put this motor together, then so can I..." As the weeks have gone by it's become clearer to me what we are attempting to do. The first blog entries are awkward and probably mystifying to the casual blog visitor. What I believe we are trying to do is to get the "radiant" energy from vacuum. It is our belief that this is the Heaviside component predicted by Maxwell's laws of electromagnetism but neglected by modern electrical engineers.
My current (no pun following) understanding is that we are trying to create an electrical dipole as a sort of "gate" to the convergent/radiant/negative energy. Our aim is to keep this gate open long enough to get this energy but not too long to allow a current to flow. We are trying to short circuit (and I don't know whether I'm using the term literally or as a figure of speech) the closed loop circuit that we use in every day lives but Tom Bearden and John Bedini criticise. In the modern world electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels (probably not from fossils - that's a story for another day :-) ) that turn a dynamo creating dipole allowing a current to flow destroying the dipole which in turn necessitates more "fossil" fuel burning...According to Tom Bearden modern electrical engineering is wrong in saying that you get a conversion of mechanical work into electrical work in the traditional closed loop hydroelectric dam (for example) circuit. The energy Bearden asserts, citing many other, comes from vacuum. It is the dipole itself that allows this channeling of energy, the Heaviside component to enter the circuit. Establishment pundits might say "what about the contravention of first law of dynamics". Tom Bearden's retort is simple: " A windmill says to to heck with the first law of dynamics !". We claim not to create energy but access what's abundantly there. The idea with the Bedini circuit is to not use a traditional closed loop circuit but to continually tap into the continuous series of dipoles created by the Bedini motor/circuitry.
The video is in four parts. The last part is a little jerky but is important because it show the discrepancy between output from the SSG on a meter reading and on an oscilloscope .
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four
So what's the point of this blog then , with the clumsily shot video and awkward attempts at explanations of cutting edge technology ? The point is that it shows pretty ordinary but very interested people trying to bring this stuff down from the "top of the mountain". "If these fellas can do it", might be the sentiment, "so can we !". We are following in the footsteps of others and hopefully the path will in time become easier to travel along. We are just doing "our bit".
Tom Hackett and myself are discussing the so called Bedini "Simplified School Girl motor" that Tom built. John Bedini came up with the name in order, we suppose to make this technology more simple..."if a schoolgirl can put this motor together, then so can I..." As the weeks have gone by it's become clearer to me what we are attempting to do. The first blog entries are awkward and probably mystifying to the casual blog visitor. What I believe we are trying to do is to get the "radiant" energy from vacuum. It is our belief that this is the Heaviside component predicted by Maxwell's laws of electromagnetism but neglected by modern electrical engineers.
My current (no pun following) understanding is that we are trying to create an electrical dipole as a sort of "gate" to the convergent/radiant/negative energy. Our aim is to keep this gate open long enough to get this energy but not too long to allow a current to flow. We are trying to short circuit (and I don't know whether I'm using the term literally or as a figure of speech) the closed loop circuit that we use in every day lives but Tom Bearden and John Bedini criticise. In the modern world electricity is generated by burning fossil fuels (probably not from fossils - that's a story for another day :-) ) that turn a dynamo creating dipole allowing a current to flow destroying the dipole which in turn necessitates more "fossil" fuel burning...According to Tom Bearden modern electrical engineering is wrong in saying that you get a conversion of mechanical work into electrical work in the traditional closed loop hydroelectric dam (for example) circuit. The energy Bearden asserts, citing many other, comes from vacuum. It is the dipole itself that allows this channeling of energy, the Heaviside component to enter the circuit. Establishment pundits might say "what about the contravention of first law of dynamics". Tom Bearden's retort is simple: " A windmill says to to heck with the first law of dynamics !". We claim not to create energy but access what's abundantly there. The idea with the Bedini circuit is to not use a traditional closed loop circuit but to continually tap into the continuous series of dipoles created by the Bedini motor/circuitry.
The video is in four parts. The last part is a little jerky but is important because it show the discrepancy between output from the SSG on a meter reading and on an oscilloscope .
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four
Sunday, 4 July 2010
Blog Name Change
The blog has been changed from "Energy From The Vacuum For Idiots" to "Overunity For Those Who Travel In The Slow Lane"
Some More Notes After Watching Bedini DVDs....
Been watching John Bedini explaining things to the camera crew and others again. Learnt another couple of things of interest:
You can't just flip the charging batteries and primary batteries around ! Apparently radiant/negative energy charged batteries have different properties. Once again it's reiterated that as batteries are charged with the Bedini circuitry that COOL down, drawing IN radiant/negative energy . Conventional charging would mean the battery HEATED up. HOWEVER you can still use the Bedini charged batteries to do the usual lighting of bulbs and driving of garden equipment etc...
John Bedini mentions that in order to flip the batteries you would have to use an invertor....
Touching upon the overunity aspects. Bedini mentions, and citing Bearden, that it is difficult to measure the overunity features because of negative energies non conventional properties. HOWEVER the charged batteries do apparently RUN LONGER with negative energy and the charging process can remove the sulphation that conventional charging won't ! So whilst I very much look forward to seeing how the oscilloscope views the various Bedini circuits we have, in terms of SHOWING something different from normal is happening we will need to demonstrate to ourselves that the negative energy charged batteries run longer in their usual applications. (Bedini mentions that a golf cart ran for 2 1/2 hours instead of the usual 1 hour )
One more thing. We see the Bedini-Cole motor, presumably a predecessor of the later Bedini monopole motors. This has a closed loop circuit. John Bedini show that the BACK EMF necessarily won't be enough to charge the secondary/charging battery. (BACK EMF apparently is what appears on the US patents with respect to the Bedini stuff, BUT BACK EMF apparently the only wording accepted by the patent people.) JB converts to the known monpole open loop circuit in front of camera and show the radiant spike charging the secondary battery. He says that "NATURE ONLY LIKES THE OPEN LOOP SYSTEM".
So a summary of what I've learnt: You can't easily flip the batteries, easily test over unity or try and be clever and configure a closed loop circuit, BUT you can observe the non conventional COOLING as the batteries are charged and observe that in their everyday operations, the negative energy charged batteries RUN LONGER and SULPHATION IS REMOVED !
(Just as an interesting aside, and some sense of the circuitry pulling energy in from the vacuum, Bedini mentions how when you have a full moon, the motors work at different speeds...I found that an interesting observation..)
You can't just flip the charging batteries and primary batteries around ! Apparently radiant/negative energy charged batteries have different properties. Once again it's reiterated that as batteries are charged with the Bedini circuitry that COOL down, drawing IN radiant/negative energy . Conventional charging would mean the battery HEATED up. HOWEVER you can still use the Bedini charged batteries to do the usual lighting of bulbs and driving of garden equipment etc...
John Bedini mentions that in order to flip the batteries you would have to use an invertor....
Touching upon the overunity aspects. Bedini mentions, and citing Bearden, that it is difficult to measure the overunity features because of negative energies non conventional properties. HOWEVER the charged batteries do apparently RUN LONGER with negative energy and the charging process can remove the sulphation that conventional charging won't ! So whilst I very much look forward to seeing how the oscilloscope views the various Bedini circuits we have, in terms of SHOWING something different from normal is happening we will need to demonstrate to ourselves that the negative energy charged batteries run longer in their usual applications. (Bedini mentions that a golf cart ran for 2 1/2 hours instead of the usual 1 hour )
One more thing. We see the Bedini-Cole motor, presumably a predecessor of the later Bedini monopole motors. This has a closed loop circuit. John Bedini show that the BACK EMF necessarily won't be enough to charge the secondary/charging battery. (BACK EMF apparently is what appears on the US patents with respect to the Bedini stuff, BUT BACK EMF apparently the only wording accepted by the patent people.) JB converts to the known monpole open loop circuit in front of camera and show the radiant spike charging the secondary battery. He says that "NATURE ONLY LIKES THE OPEN LOOP SYSTEM".
So a summary of what I've learnt: You can't easily flip the batteries, easily test over unity or try and be clever and configure a closed loop circuit, BUT you can observe the non conventional COOLING as the batteries are charged and observe that in their everyday operations, the negative energy charged batteries RUN LONGER and SULPHATION IS REMOVED !
(Just as an interesting aside, and some sense of the circuitry pulling energy in from the vacuum, Bedini mentions how when you have a full moon, the motors work at different speeds...I found that an interesting observation..)
Saturday, 3 July 2010
Theory And Knowledge Working Together....
Just a few thinking out aloud thoughts....Just watched several of the "Energy From The Vacuum" DVDs again and jotted down a couple of notes a little later, disjointed perhaps, but striking a chord with me.... After struggling with the experimental side for a little bit, I realised I'd forgotten the very very small bit of theory that goes with the concept of "Energy From The Vacuum". ( Must mention that earlier in the year I read Tom Bearden's book of the same name - phew, he's clever - but I hardly understood a thing -well some things - out of shear bloody mindedness I read the whole thing but for large parts it was like trying to understand sociology by reading a telephone directory. In any case one of my own mini goals is to read Bearden's book again in the near future. I set myself the task of twenty pages a day...
Some disjointed jottings based on my DVD (1,2 and 5) watching :
In an overunity/Bedini circuit the idea is to set up a potential and "get" the radiant energy ("Heaviside component" (?)) before the current flows. The current in a conventional circuit apparently follows Lorenz or (is it Lorentz) , "symmetrical regauging". This is what destroys the dipole and is the basis of electrical engineering since the the late 19th century - the so called closed loop circuit. (It occurs to me in a very rare thought of imaginative thinking on my part, that the word "circuit" necessarily implies "closed loop" - think" racing circuit" etc)
Evidently Heaviside following on from Maxwell realised that the "divergent" energy, viz that goes through the wire is only one trillionth (Bearden) that of the overall energy associated with the electromagnetic dipole. The non diverged component, viz the "Heaviside component" is the "Radiant" or "Negative" energy that Bedini speaks of with respect to his motors, and that which he captures with his non conventional circuitry.
Tom Bearden explained that in a conventional circuit the impedance causes component to heat up, this "divergent energy" is trying to get back to the environment....whereas the "radiant"/"negative"/"convergent"/"curled" (?) energy is trying to get into the circuit....THIS explains the cooling rather that the heating with a conventional circuit...and gives some sort of empirical evidence that something out of the ordinary is happening. GREATER impedance apparently allows more negative energy to enter the system. He goes on to say because of its "convergent" nature the charging of batteries with the Bedini motor could be explosive (!) if the charging batteries were charged with the power output from a conventional arrangement.
Below is a sketch a diagram described on DVD Part 5. The DC source on the left is potentialised by the switch on the left closing. BEFORE current flows ! and this would have to be very quick ! , energy is captured by some sort of coil arrangement in the centre. The coil in the centre is made of 98 % iron and 2 % aluminum - apparently very very expensive to make/get. This alloy delays the current by 1 ms. The speaker referred to it as "relaxation time". After the switch is closed the "coil arrangement" discharges to the load on the right.
This whole operation occurs very quickly. Below the switches are a capacitor and switching circuitry. This was described as a "DC to DC Converter" . I have no idea if this is just a theoretical concept at present or is waiting to be made. I would like to relate this to the Bedini circuitry if someone would be kind enough to point out the differences or/and commonalities
Viewing the videos again, I was again struck by Tom Bearden's kindness to the Establishment in terms of saying that various government bodies were reluctant to explore new technology, to bridge the gap as he says between what is known in Theoretical Physics Dept and can therefore be taken across the campus to the Electrical Engineering Dept. He put this down to the inertia of the older scientists. In Fact career "scientists" - possibly an oxymoron - can only work as Tom says on what projects money is given to them for. I suspect he would be less kind to the Establishment off camera, because there is no doubt in my mind that Western government may well be able to keep the lid on this stuff to preserve the existing power structure, BUT can they control the Chinese or Russian researchers ?
Some disjointed jottings based on my DVD (1,2 and 5) watching :
In an overunity/Bedini circuit the idea is to set up a potential and "get" the radiant energy ("Heaviside component" (?)) before the current flows. The current in a conventional circuit apparently follows Lorenz or (is it Lorentz) , "symmetrical regauging". This is what destroys the dipole and is the basis of electrical engineering since the the late 19th century - the so called closed loop circuit. (It occurs to me in a very rare thought of imaginative thinking on my part, that the word "circuit" necessarily implies "closed loop" - think" racing circuit" etc)
Evidently Heaviside following on from Maxwell realised that the "divergent" energy, viz that goes through the wire is only one trillionth (Bearden) that of the overall energy associated with the electromagnetic dipole. The non diverged component, viz the "Heaviside component" is the "Radiant" or "Negative" energy that Bedini speaks of with respect to his motors, and that which he captures with his non conventional circuitry.
Tom Bearden explained that in a conventional circuit the impedance causes component to heat up, this "divergent energy" is trying to get back to the environment....whereas the "radiant"/"negative"/"convergent"/"curled" (?) energy is trying to get into the circuit....THIS explains the cooling rather that the heating with a conventional circuit...and gives some sort of empirical evidence that something out of the ordinary is happening. GREATER impedance apparently allows more negative energy to enter the system. He goes on to say because of its "convergent" nature the charging of batteries with the Bedini motor could be explosive (!) if the charging batteries were charged with the power output from a conventional arrangement.
Below is a sketch a diagram described on DVD Part 5. The DC source on the left is potentialised by the switch on the left closing. BEFORE current flows ! and this would have to be very quick ! , energy is captured by some sort of coil arrangement in the centre. The coil in the centre is made of 98 % iron and 2 % aluminum - apparently very very expensive to make/get. This alloy delays the current by 1 ms. The speaker referred to it as "relaxation time". After the switch is closed the "coil arrangement" discharges to the load on the right.
This whole operation occurs very quickly. Below the switches are a capacitor and switching circuitry. This was described as a "DC to DC Converter" . I have no idea if this is just a theoretical concept at present or is waiting to be made. I would like to relate this to the Bedini circuitry if someone would be kind enough to point out the differences or/and commonalities
Viewing the videos again, I was again struck by Tom Bearden's kindness to the Establishment in terms of saying that various government bodies were reluctant to explore new technology, to bridge the gap as he says between what is known in Theoretical Physics Dept and can therefore be taken across the campus to the Electrical Engineering Dept. He put this down to the inertia of the older scientists. In Fact career "scientists" - possibly an oxymoron - can only work as Tom says on what projects money is given to them for. I suspect he would be less kind to the Establishment off camera, because there is no doubt in my mind that Western government may well be able to keep the lid on this stuff to preserve the existing power structure, BUT can they control the Chinese or Russian researchers ?
Friday, 2 July 2010
Drawing Of Components Laid Out For Fan Kit
(Click on image to enlarge)
This is for the fella who asked for more information on the youtube video. This is how Tom laid out the components on the matrix board. Of course the circuit diagram to accompany this is with the kit. (Personally as someone who is very new to electronics and the hands on experience, I would find this useful myself...) The matrix board as drawn is of course seen in the youtube videos
You mentioned that the fan motor wasn't working for yourself. Well it's either this bit , ie the circuitry part or the disassembly and reassembly of the fan itself with the correct wiring.....I sit and watched while Tom soldered the matrix/circuit board part within half an hour or so. The fan disassembly and reassembly was the hard bit. Tom had to make a little gadget for replacing the circlip on the fan motor itself. Very fiddly it was too !!
In a few weeks time we'll take apart the fan motor again and try and indicate the how Tom did the wiring. I hadn't appreciated when I bought the fan that it was a proprietary product whose inner workings had to be rejigged, ie the circuit board part of it disconnected - BUT still used as a mechanical spacer...more on this in few weeks, including the little gadget Tom Hackett made for the circlip fiddling around on the fan motor...
........................
Next week Tom is taking order of an oscilloscope. We need this to measure stuff for the SSG motor and hopefully we will then have the credentials to join the Bedini SSG research group ......
As per usual, constructive comments are very welcome....
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
Signed Up To The Energetic Forum...
Signed Up To The Energetic Forum... http://www.energeticforum.com/ and hopefully will get some constructive criticism of what we're doing and to what extent we are perceiving this stuff correctly.
Posted this in new members area:
"
Trying To Popularise The Bedini/Bearden stuff in England
Hello folks,
Having been impressed by Tom Bearden and John Bedini and there will be of course many others of note, a friend of mine (99 % of work) and myself have built the Bedini fan motor as well as an SSG and another on the drawing board as well...
For my own part I know little "hand on stuff".My mate is an engineer and we both are struggling to understand the over unity stuff and need to try to get to grips with it more.
Here is my blogsite:
Energy From The Vacuum For Idiots
and I would welcome any constructive criticism please :-) either on the blog or on here...
There is some video I've put on you-tube on the blog. No doubt many of the advanced people will be a little amused at our efforts but we are determined to get to grips with this stuff. We are at the point where we need to be able to make meaningful measurements and indeed understand what should be going on....
Simon"
Posted this in new members area:
"
Trying To Popularise The Bedini/Bearden stuff in England
Hello folks,
Having been impressed by Tom Bearden and John Bedini and there will be of course many others of note, a friend of mine (99 % of work) and myself have built the Bedini fan motor as well as an SSG and another on the drawing board as well...
For my own part I know little "hand on stuff".My mate is an engineer and we both are struggling to understand the over unity stuff and need to try to get to grips with it more.
Here is my blogsite:
Energy From The Vacuum For Idiots
and I would welcome any constructive criticism please :-) either on the blog or on here...
There is some video I've put on you-tube on the blog. No doubt many of the advanced people will be a little amused at our efforts but we are determined to get to grips with this stuff. We are at the point where we need to be able to make meaningful measurements and indeed understand what should be going on....
Simon"
Monday, 21 June 2010
More Hands On Video Plus Discussion Of How It All Works...
The last video was marred by me filming with the nightscope on....but as my understanding of this "mainstream " technology has increased so has my understanding of the Bedini circuitry :-)
A couple of friends who've received this blog link have asked "So, what's it all about ?" or "So what ?". The best answer up to today that I've been able to give has been something along the lines of an analogy with a windmill that receives mechanical energy from outside itself for FREE. We are trying to do the same with electromagnetic energy. After we filmed yesterday Tom and myself discussed our understanding of what was going on.
On the video last week Tom said that the Bedini fan motor kit was measuring 300 V. In fact that was on the DC setting. On the AC setting we were getting 600 V. THIS WEEK we're in part looking at the "Simplified School Girl circuitry" - essentially a smaller version than the propriety fan motor kit we looked at last week and something Tom Hackett built a few months ago. Tom calls it the "Bedini MK 1". He built it in an afternoon after I'd been collecting bits and asking advice off people for months ! Instead of a bicycle wheel Tom used a caster with four magnets attached.
Part One - Discussing The SSG MK 1
Part Two - .....And Looking Ahead To Tom's MK 3 !
.....Anyway, Tom makes the point that NO MATTER HOW FAST BY HAND YOU TURN THE FAN MOTOR BY HAND YOU DON'T GET ANYTHING LIKE THE SAME VOLTAGE AS YOU DO WHEN IT'S CONNECTED TO THE PRIMARY SOURCE. Tom speculated that it was NECESSARY FOR A CHARGED COIL (COURTESY OF THE PRIMARY BATTERY) AND ALSO THE "AMPLIFICATION" OF THE INDUCED EMF (COURTESY OF THE PRIMARY BATTERY) WHICH A ROTATION BY HAND ALONE COULDN'T PRODUCE....
Tom thought what was going on was that electron flow in the general environment were somehow being captured by the switching. As the coil was being charged by the 12 V primary source - and so causing the wheel to spin, the passing of the magnet was inducing an EMF which was "amplified" by the circuitry from the primary source. The primary source was thus causing the coil to be charged and also providing the "amplification" for what John Bedini calls "Radiant Energy" and what Tom Bearden calls "Energy From The Vacuum". (I strongly suspect my explanation is clumsy at best and possibly wrong in part. To the novice I say, please appreciate that we are struggling just like you, and to the initiated please enlighten us all by your input.)
Here I think the "Windmill" analogy breaks down because I think we are saying in this circuitry is, it would be like a windmill engineered to move the wind faster !
So, what I'll get Tom to clarify what I've tried to relate here and get the opinion of those who have travelled further down the road that we're on, and hope they are not to harsh with their comments :-).....as we are trying hard to understand this stuff :-)
A couple of friends who've received this blog link have asked "So, what's it all about ?" or "So what ?". The best answer up to today that I've been able to give has been something along the lines of an analogy with a windmill that receives mechanical energy from outside itself for FREE. We are trying to do the same with electromagnetic energy. After we filmed yesterday Tom and myself discussed our understanding of what was going on.
On the video last week Tom said that the Bedini fan motor kit was measuring 300 V. In fact that was on the DC setting. On the AC setting we were getting 600 V. THIS WEEK we're in part looking at the "Simplified School Girl circuitry" - essentially a smaller version than the propriety fan motor kit we looked at last week and something Tom Hackett built a few months ago. Tom calls it the "Bedini MK 1". He built it in an afternoon after I'd been collecting bits and asking advice off people for months ! Instead of a bicycle wheel Tom used a caster with four magnets attached.
Part One - Discussing The SSG MK 1
Part Two - .....And Looking Ahead To Tom's MK 3 !
.....Anyway, Tom makes the point that NO MATTER HOW FAST BY HAND YOU TURN THE FAN MOTOR BY HAND YOU DON'T GET ANYTHING LIKE THE SAME VOLTAGE AS YOU DO WHEN IT'S CONNECTED TO THE PRIMARY SOURCE. Tom speculated that it was NECESSARY FOR A CHARGED COIL (COURTESY OF THE PRIMARY BATTERY) AND ALSO THE "AMPLIFICATION" OF THE INDUCED EMF (COURTESY OF THE PRIMARY BATTERY) WHICH A ROTATION BY HAND ALONE COULDN'T PRODUCE....
Tom thought what was going on was that electron flow in the general environment were somehow being captured by the switching. As the coil was being charged by the 12 V primary source - and so causing the wheel to spin, the passing of the magnet was inducing an EMF which was "amplified" by the circuitry from the primary source. The primary source was thus causing the coil to be charged and also providing the "amplification" for what John Bedini calls "Radiant Energy" and what Tom Bearden calls "Energy From The Vacuum". (I strongly suspect my explanation is clumsy at best and possibly wrong in part. To the novice I say, please appreciate that we are struggling just like you, and to the initiated please enlighten us all by your input.)
Here I think the "Windmill" analogy breaks down because I think we are saying in this circuitry is, it would be like a windmill engineered to move the wind faster !
So, what I'll get Tom to clarify what I've tried to relate here and get the opinion of those who have travelled further down the road that we're on, and hope they are not to harsh with their comments :-).....as we are trying hard to understand this stuff :-)
Thoughts On The Politics Of Energy....
I suppose this blog will constitute a diary rather than anything systematic on the subject matter :-)
The aims of this blog are to popularise by simplification and give hope to people like ourselves who find the subject matter a little overwhelming....
IF energy is readily available from the vacuum BUT needs to be properly engineered - as opposed to us being loony "perpetual motion" "conspiracy theory types" etc WHY is it being suppressed ?
I believe the answer is this: The reserve currency of the world is the dollar. It derives it's value because most nations HAVE to sell it in dollars, and if you don't, you become part of the "Axis of Evil" ! IF alternative sources of energy where readily available, other than oil the dollar would be worthless.....and those who rule would be on top of a crumbling pyramid. Holding on to power is a very very appealing thing for those at the top - and I don't mean the puppets at the head of governments - I mean their sponsors.
I'll be seeing Tom Hackett later. He's developing what he calls his "Bedini MK III". There are several things on a practical level to discuss. I'm aware that the last video could have been broken down into even smaller steps. In future I'd like to take apart the fan motor again and look at the wiring and relate it to the schematic better...On the agenda also would also be STEP by STEP soldering of the components at some point....
The aims of this blog are to popularise by simplification and give hope to people like ourselves who find the subject matter a little overwhelming....
IF energy is readily available from the vacuum BUT needs to be properly engineered - as opposed to us being loony "perpetual motion" "conspiracy theory types" etc WHY is it being suppressed ?
I believe the answer is this: The reserve currency of the world is the dollar. It derives it's value because most nations HAVE to sell it in dollars, and if you don't, you become part of the "Axis of Evil" ! IF alternative sources of energy where readily available, other than oil the dollar would be worthless.....and those who rule would be on top of a crumbling pyramid. Holding on to power is a very very appealing thing for those at the top - and I don't mean the puppets at the head of governments - I mean their sponsors.
I'll be seeing Tom Hackett later. He's developing what he calls his "Bedini MK III". There are several things on a practical level to discuss. I'm aware that the last video could have been broken down into even smaller steps. In future I'd like to take apart the fan motor again and look at the wiring and relate it to the schematic better...On the agenda also would also be STEP by STEP soldering of the components at some point....
Monday, 14 June 2010
We Have Lift Off !
So.....Tom has finished the Bedini fan kit.
Here is the link to the kit we bought:
http://rpmgt.org/order.html
which also gives video of the kit.......
After struggling for an hour or two with the 10 " brushless fans instructions we finally discovered this very useful video:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1415284/imhotep_bedini_fan_project_part_4/
....and here is a step by step guide:
(Put link here later)
Below is a video of the finished Bedini kit in action. We talk , discuss and struggle with this challenging science. We admit we understand little.
Part 1
Part 2
Tom has done very well putting it all together. I hope people watching this might learn something or better still leave comments on the blog that will help us all better understand and move forward with this technology.
Here is the link to the kit we bought:
http://rpmgt.org/order.html
which also gives video of the kit.......
After struggling for an hour or two with the 10 " brushless fans instructions we finally discovered this very useful video:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1415284/imhotep_bedini_fan_project_part_4/
....and here is a step by step guide:
(Put link here later)
Below is a video of the finished Bedini kit in action. We talk , discuss and struggle with this challenging science. We admit we understand little.
Part 1
Part 2
Tom has done very well putting it all together. I hope people watching this might learn something or better still leave comments on the blog that will help us all better understand and move forward with this technology.
Monday, 7 June 2010
Energy From The Vacuum For Idiots - Introduction
This new blog site has been inspired by the work of Tom Bearden, John Bedini and the great Nikola Tesla and no doubt many others. The bottom line is that energy from the vacuum is freely available. The science proves it, but the engineering is lagging behind. Why is the engineering lagging behind ? Because universities receive their funding from the Establishment, and the Establishment's greatest desire is to preserve the status quo.
Currently I'm (Simon Smith) working with my friend Tom Hackett in putting together the 10 " Bedini brush less fan kit. Tom is the engineer and hands on expert and I'm..... not the theoretician - just the cheerleader and wrestler of difficult concepts and circuit board diagrams that I haven't got the foggiest about.
There's much to discuss in future blogs on this subject, including Tom Hackett's "Bedini Mark 1" as he calls it, our struggle with understanding the instructions of the Bedini 10 inch fan kit....and also I won't be able to stop myself commenting on the politics of it all.
This blog site's mission is to help popularise the work, knowledge and projects of some great people associated with extracting energy from the vacuum of space ....for those who would be fellow travellers, but who move in the slow lane...
We live in the West Midlands, England and welcome hearing from anyone especially in our region. It would be great to gather like minded people together, not only in cyber space but in real space to push this project on, which is long overdue in our opinion.
Currently I'm (Simon Smith) working with my friend Tom Hackett in putting together the 10 " Bedini brush less fan kit. Tom is the engineer and hands on expert and I'm..... not the theoretician - just the cheerleader and wrestler of difficult concepts and circuit board diagrams that I haven't got the foggiest about.
There's much to discuss in future blogs on this subject, including Tom Hackett's "Bedini Mark 1" as he calls it, our struggle with understanding the instructions of the Bedini 10 inch fan kit....and also I won't be able to stop myself commenting on the politics of it all.
This blog site's mission is to help popularise the work, knowledge and projects of some great people associated with extracting energy from the vacuum of space ....for those who would be fellow travellers, but who move in the slow lane...
We live in the West Midlands, England and welcome hearing from anyone especially in our region. It would be great to gather like minded people together, not only in cyber space but in real space to push this project on, which is long overdue in our opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)