Theory And Knowledge Working Together....

Just a few thinking out aloud thoughts....Just watched several of the "Energy From The Vacuum" DVDs again and jotted down a couple of notes a little later, disjointed perhaps, but striking a chord with me.... After struggling with the experimental side for a little bit, I realised I'd forgotten the very very small bit of theory that goes with the concept of "Energy From The Vacuum". ( Must mention that earlier in the year I read Tom Bearden's book of the same name - phew, he's clever - but I hardly understood a thing -well some things - out of shear bloody mindedness I read the whole thing but for large parts it was like trying to understand sociology by reading a telephone directory. In any case one of my own mini goals is to read Bearden's book again in the near future. I set myself the task of twenty pages a day...

Some disjointed jottings based on my DVD (1,2 and 5) watching :

In an overunity/Bedini circuit the idea is to set up a potential and "get" the radiant energy ("Heaviside component" (?)) before the current flows. The current in a conventional circuit apparently follows Lorenz or (is it Lorentz) , "symmetrical regauging". This is what destroys the dipole and is the basis of electrical engineering since the the late 19th century - the so called closed loop circuit. (It occurs to me in a very rare thought of imaginative thinking on my part, that the word "circuit" necessarily implies "closed loop" - think" racing circuit" etc)

Evidently Heaviside following on from Maxwell realised that the "divergent" energy, viz that goes through the wire is only one trillionth (Bearden) that of the overall energy associated with the electromagnetic dipole. The non diverged component, viz the "Heaviside component" is the "Radiant" or "Negative" energy that Bedini speaks of with respect to his motors, and that which he captures with his non conventional circuitry.

Tom Bearden explained that in a conventional circuit the impedance causes component to heat up, this "divergent energy" is trying to get back to the environment....whereas the "radiant"/"negative"/"convergent"/"curled" (?) energy is trying to get into the circuit....THIS explains the cooling rather that the heating with a conventional circuit...and gives some sort of empirical evidence that something out of the ordinary is happening. GREATER impedance apparently allows more negative energy to enter the system. He goes on to say because of its "convergent" nature the charging of batteries with the Bedini motor could be explosive (!) if the charging batteries were charged with the power output from a conventional arrangement.

Below is a sketch a diagram described on DVD Part 5. The DC source on the left is potentialised by the switch on the left closing. BEFORE current flows ! and this would have to be very quick ! , energy is captured by some sort of coil arrangement in the centre. The coil in the centre is made of 98 % iron and 2 % aluminum - apparently very very expensive to make/get. This alloy delays the current by 1 ms. The speaker referred to it as "relaxation time". After the switch is closed the "coil arrangement" discharges to the load on the right.

This whole operation occurs very quickly. Below the switches are a capacitor and switching circuitry. This was described as a "DC to DC Converter" . I have no idea if this is just a theoretical concept at present or is waiting to be made. I would like to relate this to the Bedini circuitry if someone would be kind enough to point out the differences or/and commonalities




















Viewing the videos again, I was again struck by Tom Bearden's kindness to the Establishment in terms of saying that various government bodies were reluctant to explore new technology, to bridge the gap as he says between what is known in Theoretical Physics Dept and can therefore be taken across the campus to the Electrical Engineering Dept. He put this down to the inertia of the older scientists. In Fact career "scientists" - possibly an oxymoron - can only work as Tom says on what projects money is given to them for. I suspect he would be less kind to the Establishment off camera, because there is no doubt in my mind that Western government may well be able to keep the lid on this stuff to preserve the existing power structure, BUT can they control the Chinese or Russian researchers ?